🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."